{"id":2846,"date":"2017-09-26T10:05:43","date_gmt":"2017-09-26T08:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/all-unclear-bgh-federal-court-of-justice-ruling-on-the-arbitrability-of-disputes-regarding-the-voidability-of-partnerships-resolutions\/"},"modified":"2017-11-23T13:48:47","modified_gmt":"2017-11-23T11:48:47","slug":"all-unclear-bgh-federal-court-of-justice-ruling-on-the-arbitrability-of-disputes-regarding-the-voidability-of-partnerships-resolutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/all-unclear-bgh-federal-court-of-justice-ruling-on-the-arbitrability-of-disputes-regarding-the-voidability-of-partnerships-resolutions\/","title":{"rendered":"ALL UNCLEAR \u2013 BGH (FEDERAL COURT OF JUSTICE) RULING ON THE ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES REGARDING THE VOIDABILITY OF PARTNERSHIPS\u2019 RESOLUTIONS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_section-01751847528dfc99e88c09c880d3cb67\">\n.avia-section.av-av_section-01751847528dfc99e88c09c880d3cb67{\nbackground-repeat:no-repeat;\nbackground-image:url(https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/3629.jpg);\nbackground-position:0% 0%;\nbackground-attachment:scroll;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div id='av_section_1'  class='avia-section av-av_section-01751847528dfc99e88c09c880d3cb67 main_color avia-section-default avia-no-shadow  avia-builder-el-0  el_before_av_section  avia-builder-el-first  avia-full-stretch avia-bg-style-scroll av-minimum-height av-minimum-height-40 av-height-40  container_wrap sidebar_right'  data-section-bg-repeat='stretch' data-av_minimum_height_pc='40' data-av_min_height_opt='40'><div class='container av-section-cont-open' ><main  role=\"main\" itemprop=\"mainContentOfPage\"  class='template-page content  av-content-small alpha units'><div class='post-entry post-entry-type-page post-entry-2846'><div class='entry-content-wrapper clearfix'>\n<\/div><\/div><\/main><!-- close content main element --><\/div><\/div><div id='av_section_2'  class='avia-section av-av_section-d18d8c2c81d10022ebd21ffa95322c35 main_color avia-section-default avia-no-shadow  avia-builder-el-1  el_after_av_section  avia-builder-el-last  avia-bg-style-scroll container_wrap sidebar_right'  ><div class='container av-section-cont-open' ><div class='template-page content  av-content-small alpha units'><div class='post-entry post-entry-type-page post-entry-2846'><div class='entry-content-wrapper clearfix'>\n\n<style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36\">\n.flex_column.av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36{\nborder-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px;\npadding:0px 0px 0px 0px;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div  class='flex_column av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36 av_two_third  avia-builder-el-2  el_before_av_two_third  avia-builder-el-first  first flex_column_div av-zero-column-padding  '     ><style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_heading-e3cfad6de2458e665a0596c4e89f5223\">\n#top .av-special-heading.av-av_heading-e3cfad6de2458e665a0596c4e89f5223{\npadding-bottom:10px;\n}\nbody .av-special-heading.av-av_heading-e3cfad6de2458e665a0596c4e89f5223 .av-special-heading-tag .heading-char{\nfont-size:25px;\n}\n.av-special-heading.av-av_heading-e3cfad6de2458e665a0596c4e89f5223 .av-subheading{\nfont-size:15px;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div  class='av-special-heading av-av_heading-e3cfad6de2458e665a0596c4e89f5223 av-special-heading-h1 blockquote modern-quote  avia-builder-el-3  avia-builder-el-no-sibling '><div class='av-subheading av-subheading_above'>26. September 2017\n<\/div><h1 class='av-special-heading-tag '  itemprop=\"headline\"  >ALL UNCLEAR \u2013 BGH (FEDERAL COURT OF JUSTICE) RULING ON THE ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES REGARDING THE VOIDABILITY OF PARTNERSHIPS\u2019 RESOLUTIONS <\/h1><div class=\"special-heading-border\"><div class=\"special-heading-inner-border\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36\">\n.flex_column.av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36{\nborder-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px;\npadding:0px 0px 0px 0px;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div  class='flex_column av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36 av_two_third  avia-builder-el-4  el_after_av_two_third  el_before_av_two_third  first flex_column_div av-zero-column-padding  column-top-margin'     ><section  class='av_textblock_section av-av_textblock-35972167d9f102c5ddaec0c531c98b9e '   itemscope=\"itemscope\" itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/BlogPosting\" itemprop=\"blogPost\" ><div class='avia_textblock'  itemprop=\"text\" ><p><strong>In the event of disputes about the voidability of shareholders\u2019\/partners\u2019 resolutions, the parties are usually interested to clarify such dispute fast and silently without recourse to the ordinary courts. However, the special features of German company law made arbitration agreements\/clauses for such disputes difficult, especially for corporations such as a GmbH (<em>limited liability company<\/em>), but also for partnerships such as a KG (<em>limited partnerships<\/em>) und a GmbH &amp; Co. KG (<em>limited partnership with a limited liability company as general partner<\/em>). Recently, the BGH has transferred its earlier developed principles for GmbHs onto partnerships in a current decision. <\/strong><!--more--><\/p>\n<\/div><\/section><\/div>\n<style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36\">\n.flex_column.av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36{\nborder-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px;\npadding:0px 0px 0px 0px;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div  class='flex_column av-av_two_third-9497bbf8bff73ea4c6992cc17fa9ec36 av_two_third  avia-builder-el-6  el_after_av_two_third  el_before_av_one_third  first flex_column_div av-zero-column-padding  column-top-margin'     ><section  class='av_textblock_section av-av_textblock-35972167d9f102c5ddaec0c531c98b9e '   itemscope=\"itemscope\" itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/BlogPosting\" itemprop=\"blogPost\" ><div class='avia_textblock'  itemprop=\"text\" ><h2>I. Initial situtation<\/h2>\n<p>A partnership\u2019s attraction as legal form is unbroken for a variety of economic activities. Many family-owned companies as well as some associations of professionals are structured as limited partnerships (<em>Kommanditgesellschaft\/KG<\/em>). If a dispute between partners occurs, the publicity of a potential litigation and its expected duration \u2013 there is always the option to appeal \u2013 can often be more threatening to the majority than the substance of the opposing partner\u2019s arguments. Arbitration Agreements can avoid these very side effects of a litigation. Arbitration proceedings are non-public. The arbitral award is generally final and binding. There is no appeal against an arbitral award. The fact that partnerships nonetheless relatively rarely provide arbitration clauses for disputes between partners in their articles, could also still be attributed to not negligible procedural insecurities.<\/p>\n<h2>II. Arbitrability of disputes regarding shareholders\u2019 resolutions \u2013 Arbitrability I and II<\/h2>\n<p>The arbitrability of disputes regarding shareholders\u2019\/partners\u2019 resolutions under company law has been controversially discussed for decades. Until recently, the BGH had addressed this matter in (only) two fundamental decisions in 1996 (\u201cArbitrability I\u201d) and in 2009 (\u201cArbitrability II\u201d), however, both decisions addressing shareholders\u2019 resolutions in GmbHs. In \u201cArbitrability I\u201d the court\u2019s concerns prevailed, particularly due to a lack of a regulation comparable to \u00a7\u00a7 248 para. 1 sentence 1, 249 para. 1 sentence 1 German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) in German Arbitration Law. According to these regulations under Stock Corporation Law which likewise apply to limited liability companies, the court\u2019s judgment has an e<em>rga omnes<\/em> effect, i.e. it becomes effective and binding for everyone, including shareholders who did not participate in the proceedings. In addition, the BGH saw the risk of contradictory arbitral awards regarding the same shareholder resolution as long as it was not guaranteed that different arbitration requests regarding the same shareholders\u2019 resolution were concentrated with and handled by the same arbitration court.<br \/>\nIn \u201cArbitrability II\u201c the BGH further developed its previous decision and generally recognized for the first time the arbitrability of disputes regarding shareholders\u2019 resolutions in GmbHs, ruling that the necessary erga-omnes-effect of an arbitral award can be achieved by accordingly structuring the arbitration agreement, i.e. by structuring the arbitrational proceedings in a way comparable to the legal standard offered by state courts. For this purpose the BGH has set up four requirements:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>All shareholders would have to agree to the arbitration agreement;<\/li>\n<li>All shareholders would have to have the possibility to participate in the arbitration proceedings;<\/li>\n<li>All shareholders should be enabled to contribute to the process of appointing an arbitrator;<\/li>\n<li>Contradictory arbitral awards should be avoided by concentrating all pending arbitration requests with one arbitration court.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>III. All good things come in threes? \u2013 Arbitrability III<\/h2>\n<p>With its decision of 6 April 2017 (\u201cArbitrability III\u201d) the BGH declared the principles developed in Arbitration II to be generally applicable to arbitration agreements in partnerships as well. At a first glance, this appears to be welcomed, as the arbitrability of disputes regarding resolutions in partnerships has now been generally recognized for the first time by the BGH. However, the BGH poses some riddles for the practice by ruling that the principles carved out in \u201cArbitrability II\u201c shall only apply to partnerships \u201cif there are no discrepancies from corporations\u201c.<br \/>\nBetween commentators it has quite predominantly been assumed up till now that the underlying differences of disputes regarding resolutions under partnership law were opposed to the applicability of the principles of the decision \u201cArbitrability II\u201d. Partnership law does not provide for an erga-omnes-effect of a court decision corresponding to \u00a7\u00a7 248, 249 AktG. An action brought against a partners\u2019 resolution must therefore generally be directed against the opposing partners and not \u2013 unlike actions brought by GmbHs \u2013 against the company. The court\u2019s judgment does only act between the parties to the legal dispute, i.e. between the disputing shareholders. The judgment has no direct effect on those partners who were not involved in the proceedings. Thus, in contrast to a GmbH there were no fundamental concerns in the literature up till now against the arbitrability of disputes regarding partners\u2019 resolutions. In this respect, the difficulties are more in the complexity and the error rate of multiparty arbitral proceedings and the corresponding arbitration agreements, especially when constituting the arbitration court.\u00a0 Against this backdrop it remains unclear how to categorize the BGH rulings in \u201cArbitrability III\u201c, especially since the court did not further explain its approach.<\/p>\n<h2>IV. The impacts of \u201cArbitrability III\u201d in practice<\/h2>\n<p>The BGH decision offers the opportunity to critically review already existing arbitration agreements in partnership agreements, especially regarding the provisions on forming an arbitration court. It remains to be seen, whether it is further necessary to amend already existing arbitration clauses regarding the Arbitrability II rules or whether the missing <em>erga-omnes<\/em>-effect of the judgment under partnership law is a special characteristic of partnerships within the meaning of \u201cArbitrability III\u201d. For newly concluded arbitration agreements it might be recommendable to contractually modify the statutory complaint mechanism against partners\u2019 resolutions from the start and to implement procedural rules corresponding to those under the Law on Limited Liability Companies. In particular, it would be advisable to provide that actions have to be brought against the company and not against the opposing partners. For the further structuring of the arbitration proceeding, reference can be made to the \u201cSupplementary Rules for Corporate Law Disputes\u201c published by the German Institution of Arbitration (DIS) in 2009 as a reaction to the \u201cArbitrability II\u201d decision, which since have been widely accepted in practice. As long as the BGH does not clarify its \u201cArbitrability III\u201d decision, this seems to be the safest way for effective arbitration agreements for disputes regarding resolutions in partnerships.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section><\/div>\n<style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_one_third-73aaecfb4fe7e39558cc207c955e4161\">\n.flex_column.av-av_one_third-73aaecfb4fe7e39558cc207c955e4161{\nborder-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px;\npadding:7px 0px 0px 0px;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div  class='flex_column av-av_one_third-73aaecfb4fe7e39558cc207c955e4161 av_one_third  avia-builder-el-8  el_after_av_two_third  avia-builder-el-last  sy-only-desktop flex_column_div  column-top-margin'     ><p><div  class='avia-builder-widget-area clearfix  avia-builder-el-9  el_before_av_textblock  avia-builder-el-first '><section id=\"categories-3\" class=\"widget clearfix widget_categories\"><h3 class=\"widgettitle\">Newsletter issues<\/h3>\n\t\t\t<ul>\n\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-265\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2025-q3-en\/\">2025 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-267\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2025-q4-en\/\">2025 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-272\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2026-q1\/\">2026 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-263\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2025-q2-en\/\">2025 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-261\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2025-q1-en\/\">2025 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-254\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2024-q4-en\/\">2024 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-250\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2024-q3-en\/\">2024 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-242\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2024-q2-en\/\">2024 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-238\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2024-q1-en\/\">2024 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-227\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2023-q4-en\/\">2023 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-208\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2023-q2-en\/\">2023 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-206\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2023-q1-en\/\">2023 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-193\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2022-q4-en\/\">2022 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-184\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2022-q3-en\/\">2022 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-182\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2022-q2-en\/\">2022 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-177\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2022-q1-en\/\">2022 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-175\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2021-q4-en\/\">2021 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-173\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2021-q3-en\/\">2021 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-171\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2021-q2-en\/\">2021 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-169\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2021-q1-en\/\">2021 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-167\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2020-q4-en\/\">2020 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-162\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2020-q3-en\/\">2020 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-160\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2020-q2-en\/\">2020 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-158\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2020-q1-en\/\">2020 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-156\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2019-q4-en\/\">2019 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-150\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2019-q3-en\/\">2019 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-138\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2019-q2-en\/\">2019 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-140\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2019-q1-en\/\">2019 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-144\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2018-q4-en\/\">2018 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-146\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2018-q3-en\/\">2018 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-136\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2018-q2-en\/\">2018 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-128\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2018-q1-en\/\">2018 Q1<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-126\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2017-q4-en\/\">2017 Q4<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-116\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2017-q3-en\/\">2017 Q3<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-114\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/2017-q2-en\/\">2017 Q2<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-142\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/deals-en\/\">Deal Announcements<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t<li class=\"cat-item cat-item-58\"><a href=\"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/category\/uncategorized\/\">Uncategorized<\/a>\n<\/li>\n\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\n\t\t\t<span class=\"seperator extralight-border\"><\/span><\/section><\/div><br \/>\n<section  class='av_textblock_section av-av_textblock-35972167d9f102c5ddaec0c531c98b9e '   itemscope=\"itemscope\" itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/BlogPosting\" itemprop=\"blogPost\" ><div class='avia_textblock'  itemprop=\"text\" ><h2>More information on this topic<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"sy-list-margin\">\n<li><a href=\"\/?page_id=1828\">Corporate \/ Commercial Litigation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/?page_id=1758\">Corporate Law<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/section><br \/>\n\n<style type=\"text\/css\" data-created_by=\"avia_inline_auto\" id=\"style-css-av-av_hr-fb479b19f087d3def54096c70f7e0968\">\n#top .hr.hr-invisible.av-av_hr-fb479b19f087d3def54096c70f7e0968{\nheight:8px;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div  class='hr av-av_hr-fb479b19f087d3def54096c70f7e0968 hr-invisible  avia-builder-el-11  el_after_av_textblock  el_before_av_textblock '><span class='hr-inner '><span class=\"hr-inner-style\"><\/span><\/span><\/div><br \/>\n<section  class='av_textblock_section av-av_textblock-35972167d9f102c5ddaec0c531c98b9e '   itemscope=\"itemscope\" itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/BlogPosting\" itemprop=\"blogPost\" ><div class='avia_textblock'  itemprop=\"text\" ><h2>Downloads<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"#\" onclick=\"window.print();return false\">Print<\/a><br \/>\n\n\n\n\t<div class=\"dkpdf-button-container\" style=\" text-align:left \">\n\n\t\t<a class=\"dkpdf-button\" href=\"\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2846?pdf=2846\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"dkpdf-button-icon\"><i class=\"fa fa-file-pdf-o\"><\/i><\/span> Download (PDF)<\/a>\n\n\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><!-- close content main div --><\/div><\/div><div id='after_section_2'  class='main_color av_default_container_wrap container_wrap sidebar_right'  ><div class='container av-section-cont-open' ><div class='template-page content  av-content-small alpha units'><div class='post-entry post-entry-type-page post-entry-2846'><div class='entry-content-wrapper clearfix'>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the event of disputes about the voidability of shareholders\u2019\/partners\u2019 resolutions, the parties are usually interested to clarify such dispute fast and silently without recourse to the ordinary courts. However, the special features of German company law made arbitration agreements\/clauses for such disputes difficult, especially for corporations such as a GmbH (limited liability company), but [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2017-q3-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2846"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2846\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2987,"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2846\/revisions\/2987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/it-landgraf.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}